Judge in Uttar Pradesh Seeks Permission for Euthanasia

In a distressing turn of events, Civil Judge Arpita Sahu, currently serving in Banda, Uttar Pradesh, has taken the unprecedented step of seeking permission for euthanasia from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Her plea reveals a harrowing tale of alleged physical and mental harassment faced during her tenure in Barabanki, echoing the challenges and tribulations within the legal profession.

The incident unfolded against the backdrop of Judge Sahu's deployment in Barabanki, where she claims to have faced continuous distress in the form of both physical and mental torment. Allegations include instances of harassment, as well as being discouraged from pursuing complaints related to the same. Frustrated by the lack of redressal and the absence of a hearing despite persistent complaints, Judge Sahu took the drastic step of penning a letter to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

In her letter, Judge Sahu detailed the incessant nature of the harassment, citing instances of both physical and mental trauma. The judge expressed her disillusionment with the lack of a proper hearing regarding her grievances, feeling abandoned and distressed. The plea for euthanasia was made as a desperate call for relief from what she perceives as an insurmountable ordeal.

The incident sheds light on the challenges faced by those within the legal profession, particularly in regions where systemic issues may impede the proper resolution of grievances. The case of Judge Arpita Sahu underscores the importance of addressing mental health concerns within the judiciary and legal community.

This incident also raises questions about the broader state of the judiciary in Uttar Pradesh and the mechanisms in place to safeguard the well-being of legal professionals. The role of the Supreme Court in providing a fair and just system for resolving internal conflicts within the judiciary comes under scrutiny in the wake of this distressing revelation.

As news of Judge Sahu's plea spreads, it prompts a broader conversation about the mental health of legal professionals and the need for a supportive and responsive system. The incident serves as a stark reminder that the pursuit of justice must extend beyond the courtroom, encompassing the mental and emotional well-being of those who uphold the principles of justice in our society.